My beef with the 4th of
July is that so many of the people who go to such great lengths to celebrate
this holiday – perhaps even a majority – are much more tuned in to dependence
rather than independence, and security rather than freedom. There’s a reason
the word “security” beats “freedom” by a 9:1 margin in presidential speeches.
So you believe in freedom? You’re
waving sparklers and flags on the 4th? Tell me, do you want to be
free to make arrangements for your own medical care in a free market
environment? No? I didn’t think so. After all, your health care is your
employer’s responsibility, isn’t it? You love freedom, yet you think that you
have a “right to health care? Tell me, just how are you going to get that
health care without some individual either providing services or materials. You
have a “right” to those things though right? Tell me, freedom lover, just how much
of that person’s life or property do you have a “right” to?
So you believe in freedom? What did
you think about George W. Bush’s idea on partial Social Security privatization?
He wanted to take about 2% of the 14% you have yanked out of your earnings for
Social Security, and allow you to invest that 2% on your own. The account would
have been yours, and you could have passed it on to your spawn when you took
the eternal celestial dirt nap! Did you like that idea? No? Wassamatta? Too chancy for you? Too much freedom at the expense of your
security?
I could go on with this rant but you
get the point. By and large Americans are MUCH MORE in love with the idea of
government-provided security than they are with government-protected liberty.
And these people will be out there tomorrow watching the fireworks and waving
their flags.
Know what? Here’s an idea. We
actually need two American Flags. We need one for people who value freedom over
security, and the other for people who, as Obama said, look at the federal
government as their parents. Hey Papa Obama, Mama Michelle! What’s for dinner?
Will you come tuck me in?
No comments:
Post a Comment