CEO, Parisian Family Office. Began Wall Street in '82. Founded investment firm, Native American Advisors, '95. White Earth Chippewa. Raised on reservations. Conservative. NYSE/FINRA arbitrator. Drexel Burnham alum. Pureblood, clot-shot free. In a world elevated on a tech-driven dopamine binge, he trades from GHOST RANCH on the Yellowstone River in MT, TN farm, PAMELOT or CASA TULE', the family winter camp in Los Cabos, Mexico. Always been, will always be, an optimist.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Fairness and Justice in Vietnam, why not in the US?
The lack of prosecution of bankers responsible for the great financial
collapse has been a hotly debated topic over the years, leading to the coinage
of such terms as "Too Big To Prosecute", the termination of at least
one corrupt DOJ official, the revelation that Eric Holder is the most useless
Attorney General in history, and even members of the judicial bashing other
members of the judicial such as in last night's essay by district judge Jed
Rakoff. And naturally, the lack of incentives that punish cheating and fraud, is
one of the main reasons why such fraud will not only continue but get bigger and
bigger, until once again, the entire system crashes under the weight of all the
corruption and all the Fed-driven malinvestment. But what can be done? In this
case, Vietnam may have just shown America the way - use the death
penalty on convicted embezzling bankers. Because if one wants to
promptly stop an end to financial crime, there is nothing quite like the fear of
death to halt it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment